a website for the conservative librarian

 About

Read

Store

Forums

Contact

Wednesday August 17, 2005

  (6:53 pm) More Stuff

     If you need wallpapers for your computer go here. Good stuff.

     I just got The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck. I've read just a little bit but have heard nothing but praise for it. Enjoying it so far. It does have a certain distinctiveness about it. Here's a good review here by way of Captain Comics.

     There's one of those memes going around. Tangognat's done it and some of the folks at Captain Comics have done it. 5 Desert Island Comics. Luckily that doesn't mean individual issues otherwise that wouldn't take up much time. You get to pick complete works. To be honest? I once had over 7,000 comics which I've since cut in half. I had padded the collection pretty heavily from various sales and had never really had the time to read all the comics I owned. I wouldn't mind having that collection back along with the time to sit a read them all.

Tuesday August 16, 2005

  (8:11 pm) Stuff

      Norma points out the rather large glass house China is living in.

     Is there such a thing as a conservative librarian? Looks that way to me.

     An important quote available here by Pres. Eisenhower. Make sure you read the whole thing because some people like to pick and choose what parts are important.

  (7:40 pm) What's The Point?

     From an emailer:

I am a librarian and archivist. I sit on both sides of the political debate. I am not an extremist. I occasionally visit your site... to find out what's going on in the "conservative" library world... but I really wonder what your point is? You seem to just be against whatever is liberal. What do you stand for? Why are you so negative about librarians, and the cause of education (MLS) and yet at the same time so involved with librarianship? It seems as if you are more interested in causing rifts then working together, receiving negative attention rather then achieving goals?

Perhaps I am wrong, and it's not that big of a deal. I just thought I'd share my viewpoint with you.

     Sometimes I look at my own posting history and say 'wow, I've been busy'. Usually that's followed by 'how many people have actually read all this?' So I can see where this person is coming from.

     The short answer is this: I'm for the MLS but only for Directors, Assistant Directors, and department heads in large libraries. I'm for a Bachelors in most other positions. I'm for filters on children's computers and I'm for librarians in public libraries taking an aggressive stand on the behavior of children and young adults in the library. That also includes policing for predators (a recent topic on the Council list). I believe librarians are a part of the community and we need to accept the fact that kids walk through our doors without their parents. I believe the Patriot Act is necessary in so far as library records not being some kind of sacred cow. Again, we're a part of the community, not separate from. I'm for materials that deal with mature themes to be limited in access depending on age group. I'm for libraries period. I enjoy what I do and have a lot of fun doing it. If it doesn't always seem that way well keep in mind I've limited myself in what I can say about what I do at work and I'm unlimited in what I'm willing to say about ALA and its various left-of-center children who are for the exact opposite of what I am. As for causing rifts... I've gone to a number of library conventions and plan on going to many more. I've made a few enemies. I think that's to be expected considering just how political our profession has become. I've made a few friends too, or at the very least friendly acquaintances. I hope to make more and I'm certainly open to it. That doesn't change any of the problems that I see or what my goals are which is to get the more extreme politics out of the profession and get what legitimate issues there are and bend them a little more in my direction.

     Hope that covers most everything, though I know it doesn't. Descent start though.

  (6:56 pm) Check Please!

     Jessamyn's hopes of ALA being a "formidable legal foe" seem misplaced considering the article she uses to make her argument. It does however reinforce my arguments from last week on how time and energy are being wasted:

The ALA is tracking about 70 separate issues, including legislation and lobbying, with a staff in Washington, D.C., of only six people—five of them lawyers.
     I'd feel better if it was all librarians because at least I know we don't make much. Bottom line of the article is ALA failed on CIPA and they failed on the Patriot Act and what few victories they claim come through the work of others. The only positive case that could be offered didn't involve ALA at all but the Whatcom Library System where the FBI tried tracking who had taken out a certain book, something even I and a majority of conservatives don't support.

     How much money has been wasted so far and how much more is going down the hole? Not to mention what CIPA wound up costing libraries who now forgo federal money to avoid filters and the cost for libraries who chose to filter every single computer. Good job.

Sunday August 14, 2005

  (2:37 pm) Must Read

To Kill An American

I've donated to SoA in the past and hope to in the future. I hope you'll consider doing so as well.