a website for the conservative librarian
|
Wednesday June 22, 2005
An interesting article in School Library Journal
called "Roots of Revolution Revisited" (Jun05, pg34) by Marc Aronson. He discusses
his research into writing a history book on the American Revolution for "young
people". The article describes his search for the roots of the Revolution and how
it tied into world history, particularly the Boston Tea Party. Says Mr. Aronson,
"The history of the Revolution is also the history of
the English in India. Neither makes much sense in isolation."
Technically, that's true. In fact if you read the
Federalist Papers you'll see that other countries and world events had a great
influence when it came time to write the Constitution. We certainly were not
created in a bubble, but we were not simply a random intersection of events either.
Americans are unique in the world in that our pride in our country has as much if
not more to do with the philosophy of what its means to be an American then it does
land or borders. There were certainly financial pressures bearing but what finally
came from what he refers to as the "revolutionary consciousness" was something much
more then mere number crunching. Implying otherwise lessens the spirit and idealism
that went into our creation. Is there a place for this? Absolutely! But when we're
educating the young of America let's make sure they have the Founding Fathers down
pat before worrying about the financial problems of the East India Company.
There's an
interview with
Mitch Freedman in the online version of Library Journal (subscription only). Aside
from the asinine comment by Freedman that ALA is somehow balanced because both Colin
Powell and Michael Moore have spoken at ALA forums he had this to offer concerning a
question on the salary initiatives:
Now they also say that certification will not be
required but "will, however, provide valuable information that employers may use in
determining the relative qualifications of a candidate." And considering the
machinery that will have to be in place for something like this to work, once its
started and moving, count on it being mandatory. Otherwise how do you justify the
time and effort of the review committees, whoever decides to offer outlets for
the 60 hours of continuing ed., not to mention the over-read and antisocial our
profession is known for who will come out of college thinking a resume is incomplete
without said magic pieces of paper?
Here in MA, if not everywhere, teachers are already
required to keep up certification. Schools even have built-in workshop days to help with
the process. But have we suddenly found the solution of separating good teachers from bad? No.
Certification, like anything, is what you make of it. There will be people
who find creative and useful things to do with their 60 hours and learn more about
their chosen profession. There will be people who clock in the hours as quickly and
uneventfully as possible. If certification didn't exist the go-getters would still
be looking for new ideas and the uninterested would still be just getting by. Its
that way in work, it was that way in college, in high school, since birth. You'll
never be able to force someone to be better and certification is insulting to those
of us who do take pride in our profession.
Freedman said ALA-APA was created to lock in ALA
commitment on the salary issue. Instead its becoming a red-tape behemoth trying to
hover over our shoulders and guide our every move. I did my time, I got my sheepskin,
I know what I want to do and how I want to do it. Get out of my face and let me do my
job.
|